I also did a GarageBand export of a 42-minute Macworld Podcast as an MP3 file, and the M1 MacBook Pro finished in 57 seconds, while the 2.0GHz Core i5 MacBook Pro took 82 seconds. The M1 MacBook Pro finished the job in 132 seconds, much faster than the 218 seconds posted by the 2.0GHz MacBook Pro.
SOFTWARE PRO WORLD REVIEW REDDIT 720P
In iMovie, I exported a 30-minute video using the default 720p settings to a file. I did a few application-based tests to determine improvements when using native software on the M1 MacBook Pro compared to the 2.0GHz Core i5 MacBook Pro. Geekbench 5 Single CPU and Multi CPU benchmarksĪpple apps such as iMovie are optimized for Apple silicon, and you’ll notice a big difference in speed compared to the Intel versions.
So what did we find out? Well, we might not have been able to replicate Apple’s 2.8 times increase in performance, but what we did see was exciting nonetheless. The beefed-up 16-inch MacBook Pro with a 2.4GHz 8-core Core i9 (with its 32GB of RAM and 2TB SSD, it sells right now for $3,899).The 2019 13-inch MacBook Pro with a 1.4GHz quad-core Core i5 (it originally sold for $1,299).The $1,799 13-inch MacBook Pro with a 2.0GHz quad-core Core i5 (it’s still available for purchase).But we do have three other MacBook Pro models that can help us draw some conclusions as we test them against the 13-inch MacBook Pro M1.
We don’t have this specific laptop that Apple uses for its performance comparison. (This Intel Core i7 was available as a built-to-order option for the previous $1,299 13-inch MacBook Pro, a machine that came standard with a 1.4GHz quad-core Core i5 when it was released earlier this year.) The company said its new 13-inch MacBook Pro’s M1 CPU is up to 2.8 times faster than the 1.7GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 in a same-sized MacBook Pro.
13-inch MacBook Pro M1: Performance benchmarksĪpple made bold claims during its “One more thing event” on November 10.
0 kommentar(er)
